Cart

    Product Price Quantity Subtotal
× Versuchsstation des Weltuntergangs Versuchsstation des Weltuntergangs 40.00
40.00

Cart totals

Subtotal 40.00
Shipping

Shipping options will be updated during checkout.

Calculate shipping
Total 45.04 (includes 2.14 VAT)
2013, English
21.5×27 cm, 230 pages, 128 color, 6 b/w ill., hardcover
ISBN 978-3-943365-77-1
Design
Blank Blank
Copublisher
Bergen Kunsthall
Status
Available

Over the past decade Gardar Eide Einarsson’s exhibition practice has followed a highly consistent thematic trajectory, continuously tracing out what one could call an “iconography of resistance.” The signs and symbols we can read out of Einarsson’s works often refer to fundamental conflictual structures between a society of control following September 11, 2001, and the individual’s rebellion against and threat to central power. Einarsson also uses historical examples of tragic, abortive attempts to achieve individual freedom, and looks at popular culture’s treatment of the myths, signs, and visuality of the outsider ideal as drawn from examples in reality where instances of extreme individualism have resulted in terrorism and crime.


This book is published on the occasion of Einarsson’s solo exhibition “Versuchsstation des Weltuntergangs” at Bergen Kunsthall, and is the artist’s first comprehensive monograph. The book contains documentation of a large selection of works since the early 2000s. Three commissioned essays provide various approaches to the reading of Einarsson’s oeuvre. Bob Nickas situates the reader in a science-fiction-inspired future scenario where a book that turns out to be an exhibition catalogue forms the basis for the attempts of the main characters to penetrate into the artist’s universe of signs. The philosopher Nick Land outlines a complex interpretative horizon in the encounter with Einarsson’s precise analyses of the language of power by exploiting and reactivating the vocabulary of “post-Minimalist” art. And Martin Herbert tackles Einarsson’s out­put in the 2000s, and shows how he continually problematizes the residual potential of art as critique and political tool within an art institution that has long since been exposed as a power structure in its own right—by constantly pointing to the contradictory oppo­sitions between power and anti-power, between resistance and repressive tolerance.